| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bootny3 Rookie
Joined: 11 Oct 2008 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:19 pm Post subject: jibberrish |
|
|
... you can delete this thread casper......
Last edited by Bootny3 on Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:55 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Daniel S Rookie
Joined: 13 Jun 2007 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I definitely think that something needs to be done to regulate classes. I know that there were lots of people that had problems with rookies running in the sportsman class.
Something needs to be done about the expert stock class. Most people go from sportsman to super stock or mod and skip expert all together.
I don't blame them either, would you rather race against 5 other people or race with 20- 30??
I like your bump up suggestions Jamal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cgandersen Rookie
Joined: 17 Feb 2008 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I dunno if I agree that Rookie should be broken up between truck & buggy... I don't think there'd be enough to fill out each class many nights. I do, however, think that there shouldn't be any 4wd in Rookie.
As for Rookies being run together with Sportsman, I think that's just par for the course to be honest... yeah, it stinks if you're one of the better drivers and get ganked (accidentally) by a Rookie, but that's no worse than much of the hacking I see going on unchecked (just my opinion). I do understand why you wouldn't want it, but then would you want to tack on another half hour to the night just to race 4-5 rookies by themselves?
And while we're discussing the "rookie" class, there should be some regulation as to who's allowed to race this class in the JBRL. Looking at the laps/times and the people racing this class the last two years, these aren't "rookies" by my definition. The people racing this class in the JBRL are waaaaay too experienced to be running the laps/times I've seen.... it certainly discourages those who are truly "rookies" from even bothering to attend the JBRL. If you have greater than a year of experience (MAYBE a year & a half), you should be bounced from Rookie for the JBRL... or if you're racing anything OTHER than rookie on a weekly basis, you shouldn't be allowed to "downgrade" just for the JBRL. Just my 2c.
Regarding Slash... well, I won't comment  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Troy Pearson Rookie
Joined: 15 Nov 2008 Posts: 26 Location: Santa Clarita
|
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:43 pm Post subject: BL and Lipos |
|
|
Have been club racing at Hot Rod for approx 5 months now and I want to participate in the League in 2009. I hope that you will consider Lipo Batteries and Bl motors to be allowed in the Stock class for 2009 since I only have a Lipo battery and a 17.5 Bl motor currently.
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Casper Site Admin
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 207 Location: Orange, Ca
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Guys BL and lipo will be allowed in all classes next year. I think the only thing still to be decided is if all lipo's will be allowed or only ROAR approved lipo's. _________________ Team Losi, Xcelorin, Spektrum, Kolor Koncepts
JBRL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FreeJack Sportsman
Joined: 04 Jun 2008 Posts: 106
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm hoping some interest is shown in 8th scale electric for the 2009 series, this is something that is starting to take off as purpose-built kits become available and will only get bigger in the new year. Out at OC/RC on the weekends they are getting two full heats of them, both conversions from nitro and native electric cars. I think it'd be wise to include this class in the plans for the new season. _________________ Kevin Deselms - Webmaster, Hot Rod Hobbies
Associated FT SC10 / Team Icon 13.5 - Intermediate Short Course
www.hotrodhobbies.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ffejrobins30 Rookie
Joined: 26 Nov 2008 Posts: 29 Location: Castaic, CA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think that you should have to run a ROAR approved pack just for the safety aspect of it. I used to run a non-ROAR soft pack in club racing and will never do it again...
Another reason they should be run is because they are what you would run if you were at a national event. If you plan on winning and getting good, then you should have to run the proper equipment. _________________ Jeff Robins - Team SCV Racing
Associated Factory Team RC10B4 Buggy - Stock Class
Hot Rod Hobbies Sept/Oct 08, Nov/Dec 08, Jan/Feb 09 Tuesday Stock Champion
Novak ESC & 17.5 SS Pro - Airtronics - Reedy LiPo
Team SCV Racing |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Barber Rookie
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 6 Location: Burbank, CA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doing away with the expert stock classes will only make the sportsman classes worse.
I'm with you Daniel, I like Jamal's bump up suggestions too... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Troy Pearson Rookie
Joined: 15 Nov 2008 Posts: 26 Location: Santa Clarita
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ffejrobins30 wrote: | I think that you should have to run a ROAR approved pack just for the safety aspect of it. I used to run a non-ROAR soft pack in club racing and will never do it again...
Another reason they should be run is because they are what you would run if you were at a national event. If you plan on winning and getting good, then you should have to run the proper equipment. |
I agree.
Nice Sig Jeff  _________________ Team SCV Racing
http://teamscvracing.com
That flo yellow and orange B4 and the silver and blue with orange flames Slash. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cgandersen Rookie
Joined: 17 Feb 2008 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | If you plan on winning and getting good, then you should have to run the proper equipment. |
Some of us don't, so non-ROAR approved packs should be A-OK... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ffejrobins30 Rookie
Joined: 26 Nov 2008 Posts: 29 Location: Castaic, CA
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cgandersen wrote: | | Quote: | | If you plan on winning and getting good, then you should have to run the proper equipment. |
Some of us don't, so non-ROAR approved packs should be A-OK... |
Ok, that's fine, but what about the safety aspect of it. If something somehow punctures a soft pack battery, it'll ignite since it's oxygen reactive. Personally, I don't want my car being set on fire because someone else was using an "unsafe" battery. I'm not saying this will be the case with you, but the possibilities are much higher with soft-pack/non-approved packs.
Also, it makes it unfair to the people who do want to get better. My 4000 mAh soft-pack LiPo was much lighter than the 5000 I run now. Not being forced to run proper equipment gives an unfair advantage if used properly. _________________ Jeff Robins - Team SCV Racing
Associated Factory Team RC10B4 Buggy - Stock Class
Hot Rod Hobbies Sept/Oct 08, Nov/Dec 08, Jan/Feb 09 Tuesday Stock Champion
Novak ESC & 17.5 SS Pro - Airtronics - Reedy LiPo
Team SCV Racing |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cgandersen Rookie
Joined: 17 Feb 2008 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Ok, that's fine, but what about the safety aspect of it. If something somehow punctures a soft pack battery, it'll ignite since it's oxygen reactive. |
Really? Or do you mean they MAY catch fire... I couldn't find anything saying they would instantaneously catch fire, just that they MAY catch fire:
http://www.rctoys.com/pr/2006/10/20/safe-use-document-thunder-power-lithium-polymer-batteries/
| Quote: | | Puncture of cells may cause a fire. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium-polymer
| Quote: | | fires can occur if the cell or pack is punctured. |
http://www.commonsenserc.com/LiPo_v2_new_instructions_warranty.pdf
| Quote: | | Use caution to avoid puncture of the cells. Puncture of cells may cause fire. |
| Quote: | | Personally, I don't want my car being set on fire because someone else was using an "unsafe" battery. |
The lack of a hard shell does not (necessarily) make them "unsafe"... this is simply your opinion, not fact.
| Quote: | | Also, it makes it unfair to the people who do want to get better. My 4000 mAh soft-pack LiPo was much lighter than the 5000 I run now. Not being forced to run proper equipment gives an unfair advantage if used properly. |
Club racing has never kowtow'd 100% to ROAR rules... to do so would be a) ridiculous given the politics and (potential for) corruption and b) would make the hobby more unaffordable to most of the people out there... I know that I, personally, see the few hard case choices out there and am dismayed by the prices. I see soft cases as the solution, to being able to be competitive and yet not break the bank. What's more, with the fact that ROAR only bi-annually reviews what's "ROAR-legal", we have to wait 6months to a year for good products to be "ROAR-legal". Until then, supply and demand dictate that with only a few "ROAR-legal" packs out there, these vendors are free to price their products at premiums far above what they should be. So why force good people out of the hobby by forcing people to ONLY use ROAR legal packs?
Furthermore, NiMH can be just as dangerous... someone recently had a pack explode in their eye... are we all to suddenly run around like chickens with our heads cut off and insist on hard metal cases for our NiMH? What if some hypothetical goober overcharges or mistreats his LiPo (whatever case) in the pits and it catches fire, are we to insist on fire-proof LiPo socks for everyone? What about me, who got hit in the ankle by an 1/8th scale car while marshalling and ended up gimp for 4 weeks? Am I to be forced to wear soccer-style shinguards?
Lets get real here... the hobby inherently is dangerous, but we knowingly engage in this hobby and try to be as safe as possible... the difference in safety between a hard pack and soft pack, to me, is negligible... and it is even MORE unlikely that another car would catch fire due to my car catching fire... as far as weight differences, suck it up. That's just life in club racing... I have NiMH right now and am racing against LiPo equipped guys... am I crying about it? No. The skill ranges are so disparate that that weight differences aren't just that big a deal... I would agree that at the professional level it would be a big deal, where races are decided by tenths of seconds... but if you are worried that a soft case LiPo guy is gonna zip by you, then I would argue it's probably his driving skill or better motor rather than the slight difference in weight. And "proper equipment" is simply your opinion.
While I respect your opinion, I simply have to disagree (and hopefully haven't come off too condescending expressing it). Just my 2c.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ffejrobins30 Rookie
Joined: 26 Nov 2008 Posts: 29 Location: Castaic, CA
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't worry, you've got to do more than disagree with me to hurt my feelings.
I feel that they should be hard-case simply because they are more likely to explode/catch fire than NiMh packs. On a simple club race night when you have 10 or 20 guys running electric, it's fine to not require roar-packs, but I think that at something like the JBRL series, which will have 180 poeple there all running their stuff, the odds of problems are much higher.
I understand that there are inherent risks to what we participate in, but I also think that there should be some kind of effort made in the interest of safety, escpecially since fire extinguishers aren't in ready supply at most tracks. _________________ Jeff Robins - Team SCV Racing
Associated Factory Team RC10B4 Buggy - Stock Class
Hot Rod Hobbies Sept/Oct 08, Nov/Dec 08, Jan/Feb 09 Tuesday Stock Champion
Novak ESC & 17.5 SS Pro - Airtronics - Reedy LiPo
Team SCV Racing |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cgandersen Rookie
Joined: 17 Feb 2008 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would agree with that... regarding the JBRL, I guess I'd be 50/50 about it (since I currently don't participate in it). I guess the compromise would be to make sure there's a fire extinguisher!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Troy Pearson Rookie
Joined: 15 Nov 2008 Posts: 26 Location: Santa Clarita
|
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="cgandersen"]
Go to Utube and search for LIPO FIRE and you will see hundreds of videos of lipo batteries igniting and burning.
Like this one for example. Its a nail penetration and its quite impressive. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OsBc8RqSKU
Take a screw driver and punch a hole directly into one cell in your lipo battery. You will see abundant smoke and a jet of flame. The lipo wont always continue to burn, but you will have a short burst of flame. If this flame ignites any other part of the car or lipo pack then of course you will have a burning fire. I have only actually seen this happen on a helo crash. I have never seen it happen on a car however with ones that have a soft lipo mounted on the side or in a saddle pack position I have heard of it happening. During a crash a dog bone or camber link or suspension arm penetrates the cell on the same car or another car and the jet of flame caught the body paint on fire.
Hard case vs soft cells - Not a big dea for car racing in my opinion. But whoever is using the term MAY CATCH FIRE is making an understatement. _________________ Team SCV Racing
http://teamscvracing.com
That flo yellow and orange B4 and the silver and blue with orange flames Slash. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Casper Site Admin
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 207 Location: Orange, Ca
|
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Talked with Jimmy yesterday.
ONLY ROAR APPROVED BATTERIES AND MOTORS for the '09 series.
I know this wil not make everyone happy but it is done to keep things safe and fair.
I also posted up the new classes. Check out the web site for more details.
There will be more info coming as things get firmed up. _________________ Team Losi, Xcelorin, Spektrum, Kolor Koncepts
JBRL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Balistic Rookie
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 10 Location: Littlerock ca.
|
Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Troy Pearson"] | cgandersen wrote: |
Go to Utube and search for LIPO FIRE and you will see hundreds of videos of lipo batteries igniting and burning.
Like this one for example. Its a nail penetration and its quite impressive. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OsBc8RqSKU
Take a screw driver and punch a hole directly into one cell in your lipo battery. You will see abundant smoke and a jet of flame. The lipo wont always continue to burn, but you will have a short burst of flame. If this flame ignites any other part of the car or lipo pack then of course you will have a burning fire. I have only actually seen this happen on a helo crash. I have never seen it happen on a car however with ones that have a soft lipo mounted on the side or in a saddle pack position I have heard of it happening. During a crash a dog bone or camber link or suspension arm penetrates the cell on the same car or another car and the jet of flame caught the body paint on fire.
Hard case vs soft cells - Not a big dea for car racing in my opinion. But whoever is using the term MAY CATCH FIRE is making an understatement. |
Troy
If you think a ROAR hard pack would have survived the demonstration you made the example (a nail in a board swung like a bat) your wrong! That would have been the same result with an approved hard pack.
A hard will also suffer from overcharging and low voltage in the exact same way as an unprotected pack or a skinned pack.
I have had my car as well as my daughters truck NAILED by an 8th scales at full speed, Mine was a head on from a mis-jump onto the front straight just I was at full speed, and hers was stopped at the end of the straight with the 8th scale at full speed, impacts that tore corners from the cars and produced no effect to the skinned MaxAmps I run.
IMHO skinned LIPO's are "safe" and approved hard packs are nothing more than a homologation fee acknowledgement and do not prevent thermal meldown.
I would like to run in the JBRL in 2009 but if I have to buy batteries too I don't know, maybe not. That was my entire reason to spend big bucks on LIPO's in the first place, one battery for each car! _________________ Slow in fast out |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Casper Site Admin
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 207 Location: Orange, Ca
|
Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I will agree soft case lipo's in a 2wd car are pretty safe. The issue comes in charging them. Do they get punchured or dented while on your pit table? A wrench dropped on them. It doesn't take much to damage a soft case lipo battery.
The JBRL is trying to go more legit in following stricter rules to keep racing as fair and safe as possible.
I really don't care what kind of arguements you make hard case lipo's are safer then soft case. All lipos if not treated with respect and charged and stored properly are dangerous. The same goes for Nimh.
I am sorry if hard case lipo's keeps you from running the JBRL next year. You would only need one to run the series though. If you got a 5000 mah one even if you had back to back classes the battery would last until you needed to charge it again. _________________ Team Losi, Xcelorin, Spektrum, Kolor Koncepts
JBRL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Balistic Rookie
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 10 Location: Littlerock ca.
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Casper wrote: |
I really don't care what kind of arguements you make hard case lipo's are safer then soft case. . |
I think you missed my point completely. I am not talking about loose soft cell LIPO's I am talking about as an example the MaxAmps that I have with a lexan case under the shrink. Also remember you are the one who posted the example of the battery being hit with a nail laden stick.
What constitutes a hard case? It would appear the only answer to that is whoever paid the homologation fee to ROAR.
Another small problem with the ROAR packs is if you swell a cell how would you know? This being the point where you wouldn't want to charge the pack again, risking a an explosion to do so!!! It would seem the "solution" to safety has actually created another danger, oh what a first. Anyone remember when the air bags were mandated into cars????
And your point about it being only one battery would only be true if I intended to only run one car. It's been about 20 years since I did a big race but I ran stock and mod 2 and 4x then and can't see going to a two or thee day event now with one car myself to say nothing of my daughter wanting to race too. I could be looking at 4 plus batteries, that's a big nut to ask to support my local racing promoter.
I am no fool; I don't want to cause a fire or explosion (outside of the occasional Sobe bomb) and wouldn't use batteries if I thought I could lose a car by doing so. I did my homework before using LIPO's and IMHO you are very close to sounding pedantic. _________________ Slow in fast out |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Casper Site Admin
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 207 Location: Orange, Ca
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Careful now. I did not post anything about boards with nails, that was someone else so be careful with who you are throwing stones at. I have also done my homework. Max amps with there lexan cases are boarder line ok IMO. If you have done your research you would know that Lipo batteries are made up fo basically lamintated plates. If you even dent the battery you can cause a short in the cells and this wil damage the cells. It may not be bad enough to cause the cells to swell up and explode but it will degrade the performance of the cell and it could over time cause a short bad enough to swell the battery. Who's to say are going to be the one that does not treat the cells right. I don't know you and am not saying you will but who says the guy next to you won't. The point is they are less safe. The hard case lipo's that are appoved by ROAR will show if the cells swell. The hard case is typically just held together with a sticker or such so if the cell do swell they will separate the case. Although we don't agree with a everything ROAR does I don't think the rules are in place to make them more money!
As for running multiple classes. My point is if you had a 4000+ lipo you could run it in two different cars back to back with very little if any performance hit. I know guys who do that for club racing. The JBRL events are one day events but with the amount of entries there is more then enough time between classes to charge batteries (Even one)
I don't make the rules. I am just letting you guys know what Jimmy has told me so far. And for what it is worth I agree with where he is coming from.  _________________ Team Losi, Xcelorin, Spektrum, Kolor Koncepts
JBRL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Balistic Rookie
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 10 Location: Littlerock ca.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, that was Troy. You posted up and I made a mistake about who posted the link.
My ignorance about the JBRL is evident; I think it was a Reedy race at hot rod that I saw last over a weekend.
I think we have both made good points and can agree that;
#1. LIPO's are way more dangerous than NMHI,
#2. in it's infancy (LIPO's) different solutions to safety have been tried,
#3. a great many people have invested in non-ROAR packs that are raced daily in this country without incident.
#4. other than a dead short/to low voltage thermal failure, hard case and skinned LIPO's while in the car are equally safe.
I did barrel role my Slash and blow it over multiple times doing speed runs at over 45 mph with a soft case 3S without issue. I did get it to go 60 but after almost hitting the radar stand twice I gave up on any more.
For me other than you tube I have not seen a LIPO fail, and really don't want to either. I have seen a car lit on fire with accelerants and it was a very small issue indeed. I was happy it had NMHI but they let it burn long enough (2min.) to be concerned about them too.
I didn't wait for ROAR to decide the criteria for LIPO's to be judged on and now I have batteries that I believe to be safe that will last for years (3 year guaranty) that I can't use at big races?
I don't think the ROAR packs are the end all in safety and can suffer the same failures in many ways that lexan cased LIP0's can. A lack of common sense being the real safety issue in their care and handling. _________________ Slow in fast out |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Casper Site Admin
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 207 Location: Orange, Ca
|
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with you that ROAR batteries are not the safest they can be but you have to agree that there rules make lipo's safer.
I have not issues with saftey of Lipo batteres IN A CAR but when out of the car soft case lipo's are vernarable (sp?). More so then hard case versions. That is all there is to that.
The only cars that soft case lipo's are not safe in are 4wd cars with batter slots in the bottom that can expose the battery.
I will concede there are other lipo's out there other then ROAR approved that are safe but it is hard to keep track of them all. This is a growing competative series that is fun but there is also money on the line. You have to draw a line in the sand for rules to keep things fair. When ever you do that you will exclude some people's equipment and that by the nature of it all is unavoidable. _________________ Team Losi, Xcelorin, Spektrum, Kolor Koncepts
JBRL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Balistic Rookie
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 10 Location: Littlerock ca.
|
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Casper wrote: |
The only cars that soft case lipo's are not safe in are 4wd cars with batter slots in the bottom that can expose the battery.
. |
I was going to get the Diggity battry mounts unti l read this. I had some glass and made a tray with a solid bottom to solve that problem.
Thanks _________________ Slow in fast out |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Casper Site Admin
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 207 Location: Orange, Ca
|
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Glass? A lexan undertray is much lighter and does a pretty good job of protecting the slots. I did land on another car after a large triple the other day and broke my undertray. Glad I was using a hard case lipo at the time. The other cars shock tower would have went right into the battery if it was a soft case. Not saying there would have been a fire or anything like that but the battery would have been ruined for certain. _________________ Team Losi, Xcelorin, Spektrum, Kolor Koncepts
JBRL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DroopysGarage Sportsman
Joined: 17 Dec 2008 Posts: 243
|
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:41 pm Post subject: lipo safety |
|
|
i had a lipo go below safe voltage on 12/30/08 during my second heat race and well it started to bulge so i put it in an ammo can..brought it home...let it sit a few days then decided to dispose of it in a very unsafe manner...first i clipped the plug off of it because i save things..next i threw it as hard as i could against a brick wall in my backyard and waited 5 minutes...it bulged a bit more so with welder gloves on i picked it up and leaned it agaist the wall...then shot it over 30 times with a bb gun hitting it over 20 times and only 1 shot produced a puff of white smoke...fustrated i covered it with an oil drip pan and then dropped 3 18lbs steel bars directly on top of the area where the battery is and not one of them caused the pack to explode,catch fire,or do anything else. tired and fustrated i threw the pack into a bucket of salt water and its still there....did i mention to everyone the disclamer *dont try this at home*....i am nuttier than a squirrel turd and do stupid things on a regular basis. im not a kid so dont even speculate..i am an adult that just so happens to like to tempt death.....specs on battery...electrifly 2 cell 7.4volt 3200mah heatshrink coating. _________________ I don't fail....i mearly figure out what doesn't work |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Casper Site Admin
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 207 Location: Orange, Ca
|
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is hard to get a lipo to expolde through puncutre. I would not want to charge that bad boy after it was hit the first time though. _________________ Team Losi, Xcelorin, Spektrum, Kolor Koncepts
JBRL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DroopysGarage Sportsman
Joined: 17 Dec 2008 Posts: 243
|
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i didnt wanna charge it after it went below the low voltage...its cheaper to buy a new lipo...and i got to entertain myself and get a good workout by trying to make it explode  _________________ I don't fail....i mearly figure out what doesn't work |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Balistic Rookie
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 10 Location: Littlerock ca.
|
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Glass? A lexan undertray is much lighter and does a pretty good job of protecting the slots.
I have the undertray and a lexan case on the battery, I just wanted to make sure it was as safe as I could make it. I didn't weigh the trays I made but it's 1/16th (1.5 MM) glass and is fairly light. Im still way under weight if you calculate the Nmhi battery to the Lipo. _________________ Slow in fast out |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Casper Site Admin
Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 207 Location: Orange, Ca
|
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You are not worried about the glass breaking? _________________ Team Losi, Xcelorin, Spektrum, Kolor Koncepts
JBRL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Balistic Rookie
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 10 Location: Littlerock ca.
|
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
glass as in Fiberglass _________________ Slow in fast out |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|